We’ve been talking about “fake” service dogs for the past two weeks. These are dogs whose owners will pretend to have a disability in order to walk around town with untrained, temperamentally inappropriate pet dogs. Service dog trainers and handlers “on the front lines” of public access have shared their perspectives and personal experiences with us, as have dog professionals from the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
Dogs that have been specially trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities are referred to as service animals. Examples of this type of work or tasks include guiding the blind, alerting the deaf, pulling a wheelchair, alerting and protecting someone having a seizure, reminding someone with a mental illness to take their medications, calming someone with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) during an anxiety attack, or carrying out other tasks. Service animals are working animals, not pets. A dog must be trained to perform a job or task that directly relates to the person’s disability. Under the ADA, dogs whose only purpose is to offer comfort or emotional support are not considered service animals.
Under the ADA, all areas of the facility that are typically open to the public, including businesses, nonprofits, and State and local governments, must permit service animals to accompany people with disabilities. For instance, it would be improper to bar a service animal from areas like patient rooms, clinics, cafeterias, or examination rooms in a hospital. However, it may be necessary to keep a service animal out of operating rooms or burn units where its presence could jeopardize the environment’s sterility.
According to the ADA, service animals must be harnessed, leashed, or tethered unless doing so interferes with their job or the person’s disability prevents them from doing so. The person must then continue to exert effective controls over the animal, such as voice, signal, or other means.
Simple enough. Dog specially trained to do work or carry out tasks to lessen the effects of a disabled human Dog must be under control.
Businesses frequently decide not to inquire about a dog’s status when it is under control and acting appropriately, especially if the person who is caring for the dog adheres to common sense handling and hygiene protocols. (Placing the dog directly on a table where people are eating or letting it ride in a shopping cart unrestrained are two telltale “tells” that the accompanying human is not using common sense or good hygiene, respectively, as examples. ).
Any dog brought into a place of business that accepts pets should ideally be “under control” around any other dogs it may come into contact with there as well as “under control” around all customers and visitors on the property.
Here are the ADA’s requirements if the establishment wants to be aware of the dog’s status:
Whenever an animal’s function is unclear, only a few questions may be made. Staff may inquire as to whether the dog is a service animal required due to a disability and may inquire as to what work or task the dog has been trained to perform, but they may not inquire as to the person’s disability, demand medical records, demand a special identification card or training records for the dog, or inquire as to whether the dog has demonstrated its aptitude for the work or task.
That’s it, that’s all. No personal inquiries about the human or their disability, no requests for the dog to perform the work or task, and no requests for the dog to have any special identification or medical records.
What if the dog is urinating on the floor, barking excessively, lunging at other customers, or growling at the staff? What if other customers are alarmed? What if someone might get hurt?
Unless the dog is out of control and the handler fails to take effective action to control it, or unless the dog is not housebroken, a person with a disability cannot be asked to leave the premises with his service animal. Staff members are required to give the disabled person the option to purchase goods or services without the animal’s presence when there is a valid reason to request that a service animal be removed.
Simple, right? If the handler fails to control the dog effectively when it is out of control, the dog is to be taken away.
To put it another way, the dog is the one who is asked to leave, not the human. The human must be given the option to use that company’s products or services without the dog present.
Again, if the dog is improperly defecating on the property, it is easy to fix. The human is asked to remove the dog.
Here’s how some dog professionals and service dog handlers see it: “If it’s so simple, why do some businesses choose not to address the issue of unruly and out-of-control dogs on their premises?”
Since front-line staff hardly ever has any power as it is, many businesses refrain from taking [the necessary] action out of fear of social media harassment and reprisal violence, says Summer Storm Kingery, DVM (Raleigh, North Carolina). I was not going to confront anyone while working for minimum wage.
Lyssa Krabbenhoft (Pullman, Washington) It is their job. There are fewer unruly dogs in the building because more businesses are starting to enforce the rules. My neighborhood Safeway has kindly stepped up and is a secure place for people with disabilities to shop with professionally trained service dogs.
The issue, according to Debby McMullen (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), is that companies are afraid. They don’t want to say something incorrect and end up in court.
Lyssa Krabbenhoft Read the ADA guidelines. If they have any inquiries, they can contact the ADA hotline and speak to a DOJ representative. I mentioned earlier that businesses need to be educated for this reason.
A boxer puppy ran after my service dog after jumping out of a cart. Without a collar or leash, I had to assist the woman in catching the six-month-old puppy and returning it to the cart. She openly acknowledged that she was not disabled and that she had only brought it into the store because it was too hot to leave it in the car. When the woman informed the manager that the dog was not a service dog and that she was not disabled, the manager said he would not request that the dog be removed. He responded that it was not his problem when I posed the question of what would happen if my service dog or I were hurt.
The fact that companies aren’t using the laws we already have in place to protect the public doesn’t justify making life harder for disabled people who use lawful service dogs, says Natalie Bridger Watson (Concord, North Carolina). Why should we think that businesses will reliably enforce stricter legislation if they don’t remove dogs that [eliminate] on the floor or lunge at customers?
A recent law school graduate from Seattle, Washington, named Janice Langbehn wrote about one solution to the issue of telling “real” service dogs apart from “fake” ones. She says:
Regarding this and a proposed regulatory change that I believe would work in [the State of] Washington and serve as a model for other states, I wrote an article for the Law Review on it. The system exists, but in the majority of states there are no criminal or civil penalties. Additionally, the sanctions are not enforced in the states that have them.
To be completely honest, I have a disability and am currently waiting for a service dog. I’ve noticed an apparent increase in dogs in public spaces, such as grocery stores, restaurants, and malls, as I wait for my service dog. These dogs frequently jump on bystanders or are carried and placed in grocery carts.
According to the ADA, it would appear that these dogs are not service animals. Therefore, I think that simply making people aware that using “pets” in public accommodations falls outside the purview of the ADA Additionally, legalizing service dogs required by people with disabilities will be accomplished by providing states and municipalities with a framework to enforce service-dog-only rules in public accommodations.
Additionally, this note focuses on a person with a qualifying disability’s ability to enter public accommodations with their service dog rather than examining the entirety of the Act. It is necessary to alter the way service dogs are recognized in public spaces in order to ensure this is accomplished. This could be accomplished by certifying or identifying service dogs in a manner akin to the method currently employed for obtaining handicapped placards for vehicles. The procedure wouldn’t be any more intrusive for someone with a disability, and it would hopefully result in fewer people bringing their pets into establishments like grocery stores, restaurants, or movie theaters without proper identification.
Understanding how the ADA distinguishes between the various service animal categories and the available model laws already in place in some jurisdictions is crucial before proposing these legal changes. The general public will be more willing to speak up when something is wrong, like when a car is parked in a handicapped spot without proper identification, if there is a greater understanding of the harm caused by pets that are misrepresented as service animals.
A multifaceted strategy will be required to address service-dog access to public accommodations. The certification and licensing of a service dog, as well as civil penalties for those who break the law, are covered in comprehensive legislation that comes first. The owners and staff of public accommodations will then be educated so that only trained service dogs are permitted on the property. Last but not least, there is a need to inform the public about service dogs, including how they differ from other support animals.
According to Lyssa Krabbenhoft, the ADA contains the solution to the issue of “fake” service dogs. if businesses are willing to do their part:
The ADA already has a system in place. Businesses could significantly reduce the number of fake service dogs if they were willing to do their part and ask handlers to remove any unruly or disruptive dogs. Regardless of whether the dog was trained by an owner or as part of a program, the DOJ does not recognize any certification for service dogs. Numerous us have invisible or uncommon disabilities for which programs do not provide training. I would still need to devote another eight months to training a $10,000 or more program dog in the hopes that it would be able to carry out the specific medical alerts I require as well as a long list of response tasks that are not typically covered in training.
I think the ADA is okay for service dogs as is. Businesses must be informed of their obligations and fulfill them. Based on behavior that the handler is unable to control, they have the right to have any dog removed. They need to ask the two gatekeeper questions. That would solve most issues.
My first service dog was excellent in the ER and the hospital, worked for ten years, and rode beautifully in the ambulance. He repeatedly saved my life, allowing me to live a more normal life. We never experienced issues with business personnel, managers, restaurants, or healthcare facilities. Only strangers who approached us at random and inquired about my disabilities caused us any problems. (Unsupervised kids are a big problem for handlers. We rarely encountered problems with other dogs because I simply avoided them in the store. I am on my second service dog now.
Natalie Bridger Watson opposes the registration, certification, and stricter legal enforcement of service dogs. Instead, she would like to see more companies take the initiative to do so and to be more “hands-on” about service dog handlers’ rights. Additionally, she would value people in general being more “hands-off” about who is disabled and who is not.
I would rather deal with ten pets wearing vests than have every passerby question my service dog in training (SDiT) because I am young, female, don’t need a wheelchair, and don’t “look disabled,” as suggested by a recent article. ”.
Pets in vests are annoying and occasionally dangerous, but I still work my dog every day despite my fear of them. My life is directly impacted by the fear of being constantly confronted by well-intentioned individuals policing my public access on a daily basis. People assume I must be abusing the system because I work my well-behaved dog, so I often receive unfavorable looks or outright confrontation. It was significantly worse when I was working my sheltie (young woman + small fluffy dog = we fit the faker profile), but even now that I’ve started working my shepherd mix instead of him, it still occurs. And it has absolutely nothing to do with the dog’s behavior.
We have a perfectly good legal system in place already. The practice of misrepresenting a dog as a service animal is already prohibited. We have many laws, and I believe they are necessary to protect me. Registration, certification, or stricter legal gatekeeping are things I oppose.
But I would really like to see more business owners exercising the two rights they have, being proactive about removing dogs that are a nuisance to customers, and generally defending the rights they already have. I believe that would resolve most of the problems we’re having.
I’d also like to see the fraudulent “registry” and “certification” scam websites for service dogs and ESAs (emotional support animals) outlawed. That would significantly reduce the amount of fakers I deal with without hindering legitimate teams. That is the only law change I support.
Businesses are currently too passive when it comes to service dogs, and the general public is way too active. Only three times in nearly five years have I been stopped by a business owner who has the legal right to stop me and inquire, “Is this a service dog individually task-trained to mitigate a disability?” and “What tasks does this dog perform?”
Every day, I field inquiries from other clients who either accuse me of impersonating a service dog or want to know how they can do the same. because they heard it’s easy and common. Since their dog won’t ever attack a service dog and it seems like everyone is doing it, what harm can there possibly be?
I wish that employers and employees would be more proactive in upholding the rights they already have, and that the general public would stop deciding who is “truly” disabled without sufficient knowledge. You can’t see my brain or my pancreas from across the aisle in Walmart. What you can see is my dog’s behavior. My dog is none of your business until that becomes a problem, which it won’t because I’m an experienced owner-trainer and she’s a real service dog in training.
Visit the ADA website’s home page and click the link near the bottom of the right-hand column to sign up for email notifications when new ADA information becomes available.
M-W, F 9:30 a. m. –5:30 p. m. , Th 12:30 p. m. –5:30 p. m. (Eastern Time) to speak with an ADA Specialist. Calls are confidential.
How to catch a fake service dog
It’s not always easy to identify and apprehend a fake service dog for reporting.
In the US, there is no online registry for service animals. As there is no quick search that can be done to verify the animal’s legitimacy, this can make it difficult to catch the service dog and identify the imposters.
It can be a little challenging to spot a fake service dog if you are unfamiliar with how real service dogs behave. However, once you are aware of the warning signs, finding a fake service dog will be easier for you to spot.
The following are some indicators of a fake service dog:
You have a few options for reporting a fictitious service dog once you believe you have seen one. You might try calling your local police department’s non-emergency number and reporting what you have seen.
In an effort to confirm your suspicions, they will make an effort to track down and speak with the owner of the potential fake service dog.
Another way to report a fake service dog is to contact the ADA directly. As previously mentioned, their website has a section with phone numbers to report service dog infractions.
Once you’ve given them all the information you have, an ADA representative will take over the case. After that, you can relax knowing that you’ve contributed to fewer fake service dogs in your city.
There are more and more warnings about the problem of people misrepresenting their pets as service dogs. One way to stop this self-serving and illegal behavior is to keep bringing this issue to light.
When it comes to service animals the federal government requires only two questions to be asked and answered: Is the dog trained to perform a task for a disability? What is the task the dog has been trained to perform? A positive answer to both questions means the dog cannot be denied access, and the law as it stands does not require certificates or proof of training. Cheaters know that if they answer correctly, no further proof is required.
Service dogs are a legitimate need for people with physical and mental impairments, but the current system governing their status under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is prone to abuse. Although the rules are strict in theory, it seems that the devil is in the details. The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice is responsible for enforcing the ADA’s regulations regarding the accessibility of public spaces and commercial establishments.
Many state lawmakers share this frustration and advocate for stricter laws despite realizing that they are constrained by the ADA guidelines. Some states are choosing to penalize those who are caught abusing the system with hefty fines.
Work is put into training service dogs so they can become their disabled handlers’ eyes, ears, arms, or legs. They deserve to be respected and honored for the work they do. People with physical and mental disabilities who entrust their lives to the dog benefit from their leadership, guidance, and protection, which elevates their quality of life. They are working animals with an important job to do.
We have a perfectly good legal system in place already. The practice of misrepresenting a dog as a service animal is already prohibited. We have many laws, and I believe they are necessary to protect me. Registration, certification, or stricter legal gatekeeping are things I oppose.
Lyssa Krabbenhoft Read the ADA guidelines. If they have any inquiries, they can contact the ADA hotline and speak to a DOJ representative. I mentioned earlier that businesses need to be educated for this reason.
Simple, right? If the handler fails to control the dog effectively when it is out of control, the dog is to be taken away.
I would rather deal with ten pets wearing vests than have every passerby question my service dog in training (SDiT) because I am young, female, don’t need a wheelchair, and don’t “look disabled,” as suggested by a recent article. ”.
Since front-line staff hardly ever has any power as it is, many businesses refrain from taking [the necessary] action out of fear of social media harassment and reprisal violence, says Summer Storm Kingery, DVM (Raleigh, North Carolina). I was not going to confront anyone while working for minimum wage.
FAQ
Can you make someone prove they have a service dog?
A person cannot be asked to “prove” that their dog is a service animal in a public place. It is not necessary for a service dog to be registered, certified, or otherwise designated as such.
Why fake service dogs are a problem?
If they have an incident or accident in a grocery store or other establishment that only permits service dogs, fake service dogs may also incite prejudice against real service dogs, according to Brozman. She believes that many individuals think that fraudulent service dogs don’t actually cause harm to anyone.
Can you ask for proof of a service dog in Florida?
The organization may inquire as to whether a pet is a service animal and what jobs the pet has been trained to carry out. However, they might not inquire about the person’s disability or demand proof that the service animal is trained.
Can you ask for proof of service dog in New York?
A provider of public accommodations is prohibited from inquiring about the type or severity of a person’s disability or from demanding documentation of the animal’s certification.